Case 1600481/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Hall v Aneurin Bevan University Local Health Board — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600481/2020
- Decision date
- 19 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Members
- Venue
- Cardiff and
- Panel members
- Mrs J Kiely, Mrs L Owen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Hall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat remotely by CVP at Cardiff on 14-16 July 2021 before Employment Judge Brace with lay members Mrs J Kiely and Mrs L Owen. It unanimously dismissed Ms T Hall's claim of detriment contrary to s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996, her claim of constructive unfair dismissal contrary to ss.94 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996, and her claim of constructive automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996.
The written judgment is a short record of the decision only. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons are not provided unless requested, so the judgment itself records the dismissals but does not set out the tribunal's detailed findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | Claim for detriment contrary to s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | Claim for constructive unfair dismissal contrary to ss.94 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim for constructive automatic unfair dismissal contrary to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.