Case 1600484/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Eynon v Venu Bar Company Ltd & Others — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600484/2019
- Decision date
- 25 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Eynon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant, Mr W Eynon, had been given an opportunity by letter dated 03 December 2020 to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment states that the claimant failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and also failed to request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text does not record any merits determination or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not state the underlying claim label; this classification follows the GOV.UK listing category. The claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued, and the claimant did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing after the Tribunal's letter dated 03 December 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.