Case 1600498/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Charlene Evans v Lumina Investments Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600498/2020
- Decision date
- 14 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Duncan Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Charlene Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Duncan sat at Cardiff on 7 January 2021 and recorded an amended judgment under rule 69 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal held that Miss Charlene Evans had been unfairly dismissed by Lumina Investments Limited and awarded her a compensatory award of £1,720.76 net.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,464.60 gross. A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement, resulting in an award of £1,600 gross. The judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed and awarded a compensatory award in the net sum of £1,720.76. | Upheld | — | £1,721 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records an unlawful deduction from wages award in the gross sum of £1,464.60; the extracted text shows £1464,60. | Upheld | — | £1,465 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,600 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,785
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,721
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.