Case 1600498/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Duke v Sennybridge Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600498/2022
- Decision date
- 2 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Duke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the telephone hearing on 23 November 2022 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the claimant confirmed that she was withdrawing her claim that the respondent subjected her to detriment(s) because she had made protected disclosure(s). The judgment records that claim as dismissed following the withdrawal.
The claimant also confirmed withdrawal of all or any claims made personally against Mr Wright as a second respondent. The tribunal recorded that, so far as any such claims were intimated and had not already been dismissed, they were dismissed. The record states that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days, and none was requested at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claimant confirmed withdrawal of the detriment claim alleging detriment(s) on the ground that she had made protected disclosure(s). The judgment records that the claim was dismissed following that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.