Case 1600505/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Panella v QN Hotels Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600505/2022
- Decision date
- 21 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss R Panella
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge H J Randall on 19 December 2022, heard by video at Cardiff. The written record identifies the claimant as Miss R Panella and the respondent as QN Hotels Limited.
The only substantive issue recorded in the judgment was whether the claimant had a disability for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that she did have a disability at the relevant time.
The document is a short record of the preliminary decision and states that reasons were given orally at the hearing. It does not record any substantive determination of the underlying discrimination, unfair dismissal, or unlawful deduction claims, and it records no monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found that the claimant was disabled as defined in section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant time. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.