Case 1600513/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J O'Malley v SHS Integrated Services (Transmission) Limited (In Administration) — 2018
- Case reference
- 1600513/2017
- Decision date
- 6 December 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J O'Malley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Cadney recorded that Mr J O'Malley's claims for notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages were dismissed upon withdrawal under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The judgment does not determine those claims on the merits; it records their disposal following withdrawal.
The same judgment notes that a claim for a protective award was still being pursued. No substantive finding or remedy is recorded in this decision for that claim.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the claimant's notice pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the claimant's holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's unpaid wages claim was dismissed upon withdrawal pursuant to Rule 52. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.