Case 1600520/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Dr Abayen Ahilan v Velindre University NHS Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600520/2022
- Decision date
- 26 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Grubb Representation
- Venue
- CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Dr Abayen Ahilan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting by CVP on 22 September 2022 before Employment Judge Grubb, heard Dr Abayen Ahilan's claim against Velindre University NHS Trust for unlawful deduction of wages. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The tribunal held that the claim was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £8,821 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted.
The record states that the reasons were given orally at the hearing. No written reasons were provided in the published record, and no additional findings or legal tests are set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unlawful deduction of wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £8,821 in respect of the amount unlawfully deducted. | Upheld | — | £8,821 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,821
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.