Case 1600530/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S White v South Wales Plumbing and Heating Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600530/2019
- Decision date
- 28 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Brace issued a Rule 21 judgment in the absence of an ET3 response. On the material before the tribunal, the judge upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and breach of contract expenses against South Wales Plumbing and Heating Ltd.
The judgment records awards of £2,816.00 gross unpaid wages, £192.00 net holiday pay, and £147.50 for breach of contract expenses. It also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded for unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The total award is £3,155.50.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records this as 'Unpaid Wages (gross)'. It is the tribunal's listed award under the Rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,816 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records this as 'Holiday Pay (net)'. It was upheld in the absence of an ET3 response. | Upheld | — | £192 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records this as 'Breach of Contract (expenses)'. It was upheld in the Rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £148 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,156
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.