Case 1600531/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Morgan; Mr P Cefai & Mr N Barnett v Darshan Patel and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600531/2023
- Decision date
- 15 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss S Morgan; Mr P Cefai & Mr N Barnett
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment covers three linked cases, 1600531/2023, 1600536/2023 and 1600539/2023, brought by Miss S Morgan, Mr P Cefai and Mr N Barnett against Darshan Patel and Rahman Akhtar. The Tribunal recorded that by letter dated 1 December 2023 it gave the claimants an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claims should not be struck out.
The stated reasons were that the claimants had not complied with the Tribunal's order contained in its email of 23 August 2023 and that the claims had not been actively pursued. The judgment says the claimants failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claims. No merits findings, liability findings, or monetary awards are recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim in case number 1600531/2023 was struck out after the Tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 23 August 2023 and about the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claim in case number 1600536/2023 was struck out after the Tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 23 August 2023 and about the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claim in case number 1600539/2023 was struck out after the Tribunal gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 23 August 2023 and about the claim not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.