Case 1600533/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Murphy v The Four Winds Bar and Restaurant Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600533/2020
- Decision date
- 17 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the respondent had not filed an ET3 response form. The Employment Judge stated that there was sufficient material before the tribunal to determine the claim and accordingly upheld the claimant's claims for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
The tribunal awarded £123.15 for unpaid wages, £238.09 for holiday pay, and £295.56 for notice pay, making a total award of £656.80. The judgment also recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and holiday pay.
The judgment does not set out any contested findings of fact or separate reasons beyond the Rule 21 procedure and the listed awards. No discrimination issues were identified, and no separate remedy breakdown beyond the three sums awarded was given.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The Rule 21 judgment upheld the claim for unpaid wages in the amount of £123.15. | Upheld | — | £123 |
| Holiday pay | The Rule 21 judgment upheld the claim for holiday pay in the amount of £238.09. | Upheld | — | £238 |
| Breach of contract | The Rule 21 judgment upheld the claim for notice pay in the amount of £295.56. | Upheld | — | £296 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £657
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.