Case 1600535/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I Evans v Eva-Lution Property Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600535/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 8 June 2022, the Tribunal gave Mr I Evans an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on whether his unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out because of insufficient service. The claimant did not make any representations in writing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37. The judgment records that the claimant’s remaining claim for disability discrimination remained live and was not determined in this judgment. No remedy was awarded in this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The Tribunal gave the claimant until 8 June 2022 to make representations or request a hearing on whether the unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out for insufficient service. No representations were received, so the claim was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37
- insufficient service
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.