Case 1600545/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Luca Loiudice v Dolce Vita Dining Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600545/2024
- Decision date
- 8 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge K Hunt Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff Magistrates Court
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Luca Loiudice
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge K Hunt, sitting alone at Cardiff Magistrates Court on 4 July 2024, upheld all of the Claimant's complaints against Dolce Vita Dining Ltd. The Tribunal found that the Respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the Claimant's wages, comprising a 10-hour shortfall for September (£110.00) and unpaid October wages together with three unpaid November shifts (£1,410.14), and ordered payment of a gross sum of £1,520.14 less tax and NICs.
The Tribunal also found the breach of contract complaint in respect of one week's notice pay to be well founded and awarded £330.00 in damages, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likely treatment of the sum as Post Employment Notice Pay. The holiday pay complaint was upheld on the basis that the Respondent had failed to pay the Claimant in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and a gross sum of £825.97 was ordered in respect of 75.5 hours of accrued but untaken holiday due on termination.
The Tribunal further found that when proceedings were begun the Respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the Claimant with a written statement of employment particulars, and that there were no exceptional circumstances making an award unjust or inequitable. Under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 the Respondent was ordered to pay £660.00, equivalent to two weeks' gross pay. Written reasons were not provided as the reasons had been given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found unlawful deductions: £110.00 (10 hours shortfall for September) and £1,410.14 (October wages of £1,248.11 plus three unpaid shifts on 1 and 4 November of £162.03). Gross sum of £1,520.14 ordered, less tax and NICs. | Upheld | — | £1,520 |
| Breach of contract | Complaint for one week's notice pay well founded; £330.00 awarded as damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax liability as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £330 |
| Holiday pay | Respondent failed to pay in accordance with regulation 14(2) and/or 16(1) of the Working Time Regulations 1998. Gross sum of £825.97 ordered (less tax and NICs) for 75.5 hours of accrued but untaken holiday due on termination. | Upheld | — | £826 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars. Award made under section 38 Employment Act 2002 equal to two weeks' gross pay (£660.00); no exceptional circumstances making such an award unjust or inequitable. | Upheld | — | £660 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,336
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- regulation 14(2) Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 16(1) Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.