Case 1600553/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Glass v Jestyn Jefferys Solicitors — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600553/2019
- Decision date
- 18 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RF Powell
- Venue
- Swansea
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Glass
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Mrs S Glass was dismissed by reason of redundancy. It found that the respondent had failed to pay statutory notice pay, so the breach of contract claim was well founded and damages of £2,637.96 gross were awarded.
The tribunal also upheld the claim for unlawful deductions from wages and ordered payment of £109.80 gross. Separately, it found that the claim for unpaid annual leave was dismissed upon withdrawal.
On redundancy pay, the tribunal noted that the claimant had fifteen years' continuous service and was at all material times over twenty-one and under forty years of age. Using a gross weekly wage of £219.83, it ordered the respondent to pay a redundancy payment of £3,297.45.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim succeeded by reason of the respondent's failure to pay statutory notice pay. | Upheld | — | £2,638 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded for unlawful deductions from wages in the gross sum stated by the tribunal. | Upheld | — | £110 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the claim for unpaid annual leave was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant had fifteen years' continuous service, was over 21 and under 40 at the material time, and awarded the redundancy payment calculated on her gross weekly wage of £219.83. | Upheld | — | £3,297 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,045
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.