Case 1600559/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Ansell v The Green Dragon & Kitchen and The Green Dragon Inn — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600559/2023
- Decision date
- 11 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Ansell
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was listed for final hearing on 9 January 2024 before Employment Judge Harfield in Cardiff by video. The claimant did not attend. The judgment records that he had emailed on 5 January 2024 saying his father was in hospital, that he was on the Isle of Wight, and that he would be back in Wales on 12 January, asking for the hearing date to be changed.
Employment Judge Moore directed the claimant to provide travel documents by midday on 8 January 2024, but he did not do so. Employment Judge Sharp then directed that, in the absence of evidence, the hearing would remain listed. The clerk attempted to contact the claimant by telephone and email on the hearing day, but he still did not attend.
The tribunal also noted a history of non-compliance with case management directions, including apparent failures to provide a schedule of loss, disclosure, and a witness statement, and failures to confirm compliance with earlier directions on 8 and 14 December 2023. Having considered the available information about the claimant's absence, the tribunal decided under Rule 47 to dismiss the claims. No merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. The PDF text does not separately set out the substantive pleaded issues; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the combined decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. The PDF text does not separately set out the substantive pleaded issues; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the combined decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismisses the claim under Rule 47 after the claimant did not attend. The PDF text does not separately set out the substantive pleaded issues; this claim type is taken from the gov.uk listing for the combined decision. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.