Case 1600563/2017 · Employment Tribunal
Ms A Clenton v Mr P Roberts and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600563/2017
- Decision date
- 13 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Vernon Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms A Clenton
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary issue hearing in Cardiff on 10 and 11 June 2019 before Employment Judge Vernon. The tribunal considered the issue of disability and heard oral evidence from the claimant, Ms A Clenton, together with evidence from the parties on that preliminary question.
The tribunal found that Ms Clenton is, and was at all material times to the claims, a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. The decision records only that finding on the preliminary issue and does not determine any liability or remedy for the substantive claims in this judgment.
No monetary award is recorded in the written decision. The judgment notes that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days, and the published text is limited to the disability preliminary issue.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal found the claimant was and had at all material times been a disabled person within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.