Case 1600564/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Duda v David Wood Baking Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600564/2020
- Decision date
- 14 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Othen Appearances
- Venue
- Mold Law Courts and Llandudno Magistrates Court
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Duda
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr W Duda's claim for unfair dismissal against David Wood Baking Ltd was well founded. The judgment was given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out the tribunal's detailed reasons or factual findings beyond the liability outcome.
The only remedy point recorded in the written decision is that the claimant's basic award should be reduced by 10% because of his conduct before dismissal, under section 122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996. No monetary figures are stated in the extracted text, so the amount of the basic award, any compensatory award, and the total award are not recorded here.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim well founded. The written record records a 10% reduction to the basic award under section 122(2) Employment Rights Act 1996 because of the claimant's conduct before dismissal, but no monetary figure is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.122(2) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.