Case 1600566/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Godsall v The Naked Vegan Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600566/2023
- Decision date
- 6 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Godsall
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 14 March 2023. The respondent, The Naked Vegan Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation), failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £437.12 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of a further £120.89 gross. The claimant was recorded as responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due. The combined monetary award on the judgment is £558.01.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £437 |
| Holiday pay | Determined on the papers under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. | Upheld | — | £121 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £558
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.