Case 1600582/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Kendrick v South Wales Plumbing and Heating Ltd and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600582/2019
- Decision date
- 21 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr P Kendrick
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 25 March 2022, Employment Judge J Bromige gave Mr P Kendrick an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the claimant failed to make representations in writing, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claim on 20 April 2022. The judgment does not contain findings on the substantive merits of the pleaded complaints, and it records no monetary award or other remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment does not separate individual heads of claim. The entire claim was struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not separate individual heads of claim. The entire claim was struck out for not having been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.