Case 1600583/2019 · Employment Tribunal
No Appearance For the v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600583/2019
- Decision date
- 9 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge W Beard Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No Appearance For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that neither party appeared at the hearing. It found the claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay well founded on the respondent's admission, and declared that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment, also on the respondent's admission.
The claimant's unlawful deduction of wages claim concerning holiday pay was found not well founded and was dismissed. The judgment states that the respondent had paid the claimant the relevant sums for breach of contract and redundancy payment, so no further remedy was ordered.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes the claim as breach of contract (notice pay), well founded on the respondent's admission. It also records that the relevant sum had been paid, but gives no figure. | Upheld | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal declared that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment on the respondent's admission. It records that the relevant sum had been paid, but gives no figure. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unlawful deduction of wages claim for holiday pay, found not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.