Case 1600587/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Allan v Care For You Premier Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600587/2023
- Decision date
- 30 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 20 March 2023. The respondent, Care For You Premier Limited, failed to present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay Ms L Allan £115.00 gross. The judgment stated that the claimant is responsible for any tax and national insurance due.
The total amount payable was £115.00. The hearing listed for 21 July 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages. The award was stated as £115.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £115 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £115
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.