Case 1600593/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Dixon v Ideal Playtime Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600593/2019
- Decision date
- 15 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Dixon
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Cardiff on 14 October 2019, Employment Judge S Jenkins heard Miss S Dixon's claims against Ideal Playtime Limited. The tribunal recorded that her claims in respect of unauthorised deductions from wages and accrued but untaken holiday succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the Respondent to pay £44.28 for unpaid wages and £177.12 for time off in lieu of overtime. It also ordered payment of £206.64 for accrued but untaken holiday. The written record notes that if any part of the wage, overtime, or holiday sums had already been paid, the balance due would be reduced accordingly.
The total gross payment ordered was £428.04.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award under this head covered £44.28 for unpaid wages and £177.12 for time off in lieu of overtime. | Upheld | — | £221 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment awarded £206.64 for accrued but untaken holiday; the written record notes that any part already paid would reduce the balance. | Upheld | — | £207 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £428
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.