Case 1600618/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Bryan v Chatime Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600618/2022
- Decision date
- 2 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Bryan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint in this judgment. By a letter dated 30 June 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge Jenkins ordered that the complaint of unfair dismissal be struck out.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 20 September 2022, but the extract does not identify those claims or decide them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after a letter dated 30 June 2022 invited representations or a request for a hearing, and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing. The judgment says the claimant's remaining claim(s) stayed listed for hearing on 20 September 2022, but those claims are not identified in this extract. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.