Case 1600623/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600623/2018
- Decision date
- 23 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in public at Leeds on 18 October 2019, Employment Judge Davies considered the claimant's disability discrimination claims against Prism UK Medical Ltd. The tribunal held that, at the time of the events complained of, the claimant was not disabled within s 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. Those disability discrimination claims were therefore dismissed.
The judgment also records that on 10 August 2018 Employment Judge Povey noted the claimant's withdrawal of her claims of unfair dismissal and for redundancy and other payments. Those claims were dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant.
No monetary award was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held that at the time of the events complained of the claimant was not disabled within s 6 and Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | On 10 August 2018 Employment Judge Povey recorded that the claimant withdrew this claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records withdrawal of the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal and for redundancy and other payments. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | This captures the 'other payments' part of the withdrawn claims recorded by Employment Judge Povey on 10 August 2018. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.