Case 1600627/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R O'Sullivan v SoulTek (Scotland) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600627/2023
- Decision date
- 4 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R O'Sullivan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the claim. Instead, by letter dated 16 August 2023, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge C Sharp ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment is procedural only and records no findings on liability, remedy, or any substantive breach. The judgment was sent to the parties on 4 October 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 16 August 2023, the claimant was given an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but did not make representations or sufficient representations, or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.