Case 1600629/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Warrington v Spa At Old Hall Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600629/2021
- Decision date
- 30 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Harfield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Warrington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which the claimant, Ms K Warrington, was found to have been dismissed by reason of redundancy. The tribunal awarded her a statutory redundancy payment of £8,267.85.
The tribunal also found in the claimant's favour on several contractual and pay-related matters. It ordered the respondent to pay £5,221.80 in damages for breach of contract relating to notice, £5,054.00 for accrued but unpaid holiday entitlement on termination, and £740.79 for unpaid pension contributions.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's pay and ordered payment of £3,679.95 for arrears of pay. The judgment records that the claimant was responsible for any tax and employee national insurance contributions due on the sums identified as gross payments where stated.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Statutory redundancy payment awarded in the gross sum of £8,267.85. | Upheld | — | £8,268 |
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice; gross sum of £5,221.80. | Upheld | — | £5,222 |
| Holiday pay | Award for accrued and outstanding holiday entitlement on termination; gross sum of £5,054.00. | Upheld | — | £5,054 |
| Breach of contract | Award for unpaid pension contributions; gross sum of £740.79. | Upheld | — | £741 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Award for unauthorised deductions from pay / arrears of pay; gross sum of £3,679.95. | Upheld | — | £3,680 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £22,964
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.