Case 1600630/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. N. Adamson v Spa At Old Hall Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1600630/2021
- Decision date
- 29 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Evans Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. N. Adamson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N. Adamson presented claims on 21 April 2021 arising from the termination of her employment, including a statutory redundancy payment, notice pay said to be due in breach of contract, holiday pay on termination, unpaid pension contributions said to be in breach of contract, and unauthorised deductions from wages.
The respondent did not present a response. The tribunal recorded that it could not enter judgment on the claimant's claims because insufficient information had been provided, including the claimant's date of birth, employment dates, role, pay, and other terms of employment. On 16 November 2021 the claimant was asked to provide details of what was being sought and how the sums were calculated, but no response was received.
The final merits hearing took place on 18 January 2022. The claimant did not attend and there was no contact with the tribunal to explain her absence. Applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013, the tribunal found that practicable enquiries into the absence had been made, that there was nothing to suggest the correspondence had not reached the claimant, and that no further steps could be taken. It held that the claimant had not substantiated her claims and dismissed them all.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed with the other claims because the claimant did not attend the final merits hearing and had not provided sufficient information to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissed with the other claims because the claimant did not attend the final merits hearing and had not provided sufficient information to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed with the other claims because the claimant did not attend the final merits hearing and had not provided sufficient information to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | This refers to the pleaded claim for failure to pay pension contributions. It was dismissed with the other claims for want of substantiation and non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed with the other claims because the claimant did not attend the final merits hearing and had not provided sufficient information to substantiate the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Schedule 1, rule 47 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.