Case 1600635/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Joshua Griffiths v Smart Dough Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600635/2022
- Decision date
- 14 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Joshua Griffiths
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response and did not attend the hearing. The claimant also did not attend, but was represented by his mother. On the documentary evidence, the tribunal found that Mr Joshua Griffiths worked for Smart Dough Ltd as a bakery operative from 9 August 2018, was paid £8.40 per hour, worked an average of 48 hours per week, and had not been provided with a statement of terms and conditions.
The tribunal found that Mr Griffiths emailed on 10 March 2022 to resign and take another job. Although the attached resignation letter was not available, the tribunal inferred from the respondent's reply and the claimant's evidence that one week's notice had been given, making the effective date of termination 17 March 2022. The claimant had asked about payment and his P45 on 21 March 2022, and the tribunal accepted that he had not received pay for work done between 27 February 2022 and 13 March 2022.
The claims for unfair dismissal and redundancy payment failed because the claimant had resigned rather than being dismissed. The tribunal also found that he had been prevented from taking leave because of the operational needs of the business and that, over the previous two years, he had only taken five days' holiday. It accepted that outstanding holiday remained due on termination.
The tribunal awarded £739.20 gross for unpaid wages, £3,427.20 gross for untaken holiday pay, and £403.20 gross for one week's notice pay by way of damages for breach of contract. It calculated the holiday award using the claimant's figures, including eight hours per day at £8.40 per hour and the statutory minimum holiday entitlement under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unpaid wages for work done between 27 February 2022 and 13 March 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £739 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found untaken holiday due on termination and awarded the gross sum. It calculated the figure using the claimant's calculation, eight hours per day at £8.40 per hour, and the statutory minimum holiday under the Working Time Regulations 1998, with a shortfall of 51 days after five days' leave over two years. | Upheld | — | £3,427 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was not entitled to a redundancy payment because he resigned from his employment on 10 March 2022 to start another job. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant had resigned on 10 March 2022 and so the unfair dismissal claim did not succeed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract in relation to notice of termination and awarded one week's pay as damages, based on 48 hours' average weekly pay at £8.40 per hour. | Upheld | — | £403 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,570
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.