Case 1600639/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Spencer Grennan v Commissioners for HM Revenue & Customs — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600639/2019
- Decision date
- 21 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Frazer Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Spencer Grennan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment was issued on a preliminary issue. The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for disability discrimination had been presented outside the ordinary time issue requiring determination.
Employment Judge A Frazer extended time for presentation of the disability discrimination claims on a just and equitable basis under s.123 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not determine liability, remedy, or any unfair dismissal or breach of contract claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment decides only a preliminary issue: time for presentation of the claimant's disability discrimination claims was extended on a just and equitable basis under s.123 Equality Act 2010. It does not determine the substantive discrimination claims. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable basis
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.