Case 1600645/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Jethro Faulkner v Ray Seager Scaffolding Services Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600645/2023
- Decision date
- 5 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Bromige Representation
- Venue
- Wales ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Jethro Faulkner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment after the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found that Mr Jethro Faulkner had been unfairly dismissed by Ray Seager Scaffolding Services Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation). It also found two further statutory claims well-founded: failure to provide written particulars of employment under s.1 ERA 1996 and failure to provide a written statement of reasons for dismissal under s.93 ERA 1996.
The tribunal also held that the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment by failing to pay one week of wages before dismissal and by failing to pay statutory notice pay. It awarded £4,249.40 for wrongful dismissal/breach of contract, comprising £109.40 for one week of unpaid wages, limited to SSP, and £4,140.00 for nine weeks' statutory notice pay.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,140.00 and a compensatory award of £3,504.60. The compensatory award comprised £2,730.00 for seven weeks' lost earnings, £234.60 for loss of employer pension contributions, £500.00 for loss of statutory rights, and £40.00 for job-search expenses.
For the written particulars claim, the tribunal considered it just and equitable to award four weeks' pay, totalling £1,840.00. For the written statement of reasons claim, it awarded two weeks' pay, totalling £920.00. The judgment records a total award of £13,408.64 and, for recoupment purposes, a prescribed element of £2,964.60 covering 30 April 2023 to 21 June 2023.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded under the heading 'Wrongful Dismissal/Breach of Contract' for one week of unpaid wages, limited to SSP at £109.40, and nine weeks' statutory notice pay at £4,140.00. | Upheld | — | £4,249 |
| Unfair dismissal | Basic award of £4,140.00 plus compensatory award of £3,504.60, made up of lost earnings, pension contributions, loss of statutory rights, and job-search expenses. | Upheld | — | £7,645 |
| Other | Failure to provide written particulars of employment under s.1 ERA 1996; the tribunal awarded four weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,840 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of reasons for dismissal under s.93 ERA 1996; the tribunal awarded two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £920 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,409
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,140
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,505
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.1 ERA 1996
- s.93 ERA 1996
- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.