Case 1600650/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Walters v Community Care Services — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600650/2022
- Decision date
- 20 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Walters
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss C Walters' unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that by a letter dated 30 June 2022 the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the complaint should not be struck out, but she failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the unfair dismissal complaint should be struck out. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the dismissal claim, any compensation, or any separate remedy award for that complaint.
The reasons also state that the claimant's remaining claim remained listed for hearing on 13 October 2022. The text contains an apparent date inconsistency, in that the reasons are dated 15 July 2022 while the footer states the judgment was sent to the parties on 20 May 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the unfair dismissal complaint after a letter dated 30 June 2022 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, and no sufficient representations or hearing request was made. The reasons section says the claimant's remaining claim stayed listed for hearing on 13 October 2022. The judgment text also records 'JUDGMENT SENT TO THE PARTIES ON 20 May 2022' despite the reasons being dated 15 July 2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.