Case 1600661/2020 · Employment Tribunal

Miss G Nkoumbou v Connect Assist Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 1600661/2020
Decision date: 23 February 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge G Cawthray Representation

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss G Nkoumbou

Respondent

Connect Assist Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The case was heard at Cardiff by video on 18 February 2022 before Employment Judge G Cawthray. The written judgment records that Miss G Nkoumbou’s unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. No monetary award was made in respect of that claim.

The tribunal also dealt with two disability discrimination claims: direct disability discrimination and discrimination arising from disability. It found both claims were not presented in time and decided it was not just and equitable to extend time, so both claims were dismissed. The short written record does not set out further factual findings or any remedy hearing.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—
Disability discrimination	Direct disability discrimination claim. The tribunal found it was not presented in time and declined to extend time because it was not just and equitable to do so.	Dismissed	Disability	—
Disability discrimination	Discrimination arising from disability claim. The tribunal found it was not presented in time and declined to extend time because it was not just and equitable to do so.	Dismissed	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.