Case 1600663/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Anne Southam v Sweet Scent Limited — 2018
- Case reference
- 1600663/2018
- Decision date
- 3 August 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cadney Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Anne Southam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn a judgment dated 3 August 2018, Employment Judge Cadney recorded that no ET3 response form had been received from Sweet Scent Limited. The judge said there was sufficient material before the tribunal to enable a proper determination under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013.
On that basis, the tribunal upheld the claimant's claim for unpaid holiday pay and awarded £506.25. The judgment does not separate the award into different heads of loss; it records only the single sum for unpaid holiday pay.
The judgment also states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions that may be due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment upholds a single claim described as 'Unpaid Holiday Pay' in the absence of an ET3 response form. | Upheld | — | £506 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £506
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.