Case 1600663/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khan v Hutchison 3G UK Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600663/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard Mr S Khan’s claims against Hutchison 3G UK Limited at Cardiff by video on 1 February 2023, with Employment Judge S Jenkins sitting alone. The judgment was given orally at the hearing and recorded in writing on 3 February 2023.
The claim for unauthorised deductions from wages was dismissed because it was not presented within three months beginning with the date of payment from which the alleged deduction was made. The tribunal found that it had been reasonably practicable for that claim to have been brought within the limitation period.
Mr Khan’s claims of discrimination on the grounds of race and religion were also dismissed on limitation grounds. The tribunal found that those claims were not brought within three months beginning with the date of the acts complained of, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying complaints were recorded, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed as out of time: the claim was not brought within three months beginning with the date of payment, and it had been reasonably practicable to bring it within that period. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Dismissed as out of time: the complaint was not brought within three months beginning with the date of the act complained of, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | Dismissed as out of time: the complaint was not brought within three months beginning with the date of the act complained of, and it was not just and equitable to extend time. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- three months beginning with the date of payment
- reasonably practicable
- three months beginning with the date of the act
- just and equitable to extend time
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.