Case 1600669/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N James Roper v Llantwit Fardre Constitutional Club — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600669/2023
- Decision date
- 16 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N James Roper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim after previously writing to the Claimant on 7 May 2024 to invite representations or a hearing request on why strike out should not follow. The reasons given were non-compliance with case management orders and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim and vacated the hearing listed for 21 May 2024.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment states that the claim is struck out. The claim type is taken from the case context/listing because the judgment text itself does not set out separate pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment states that the claim is struck out. The claim type is taken from the case context/listing because the judgment text itself does not set out separate pleaded claims. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The listing refers to remuneration and written pay statement matters, but the short judgment does not specify a locked taxonomy claim type beyond the strike-out outcome. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.