Case 1600675/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B O’Brien v Croeso Staff Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600675/2020
- Decision date
- 6 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B O’Brien
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment in a holiday pay claim brought by Mr B O’Brien against Croeso Staff Ltd. The case was due to be heard in person on 4 May 2020 but was converted to a telephone preliminary hearing because of the Covid-19 pandemic. The respondent did not attend.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent had confirmed in writing on 31 March 2020 and again on 1 May 2020 that it agreed to pay the claimant £259.82 and would not be attending the hearing. On that basis, and applying the overriding objective, Employment Judge Moore issued judgment by consent.
The judgment ordered the respondent to pay £259.82 in respect of the claimant’s holiday pay claim. No other remedy components were identified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Judgment by consent. The respondent confirmed in writing on 31 March 2020 and 1 May 2020 that it agreed to pay the claimant £259.82 and would not attend the hearing. | Settled | — | £260 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £260
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.