Case 1600675/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss O Legname v Gvcc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600675/2024
- Decision date
- 18 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brace Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss O Legname
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 February 2024 Miss O Legname presented a claim against GVCC in the Wales Employment Tribunals. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Brace Date decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 9 May 2024 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £343.98. It also found that the respondent had failed to provide particulars of employment and ordered payment of £416.80, described as equivalent to two weeks’ pay. The total sum payable was £760.78, and the judgment recorded that the claimant is responsible for any income tax and employee national insurance due.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £344 |
| Other | Failure to provide particulars of employment; award stated as equivalent to two weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £417 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £761
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.