Case 1600676/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Field v THG Holidays Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600676/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins
- Venue
- Cardiff
- Panel members
- Mrs H Hinkin, Mrs M Humphries
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Field
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Cardiff, sitting on 10 and 11 February 2020 before Employment Judge S Jenkins with Mrs H Hinkin and Mrs M Humphries, heard Miss L Field's claims against THG Holidays Limited. It held that the claimant was disabled at the relevant times for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. Her claim of direct discrimination on the ground of sex failed and was dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Direct discrimination on the ground of sex was dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal found the claimant was disabled at the relevant times and that the respondent failed to comply with its duty to make reasonable adjustments under sections 20 and 21 EqA 2010. | Upheld | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,486
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £2,371
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.6 EqA 2010
- s.20 EqA 2010
- s.21 EqA 2010
- s.1(1) ERA 1996
- s.38(3) EA 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.