Case 1600677/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Brown v M&M Aggregates Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600677/2024
- Decision date
- 5 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Harfield Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the Claimant’s unfair dismissal complaint. It recorded that, by letter dated 8 May 2024, the Claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because it appeared from the claim that he had been employed for less than two years.
The Claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint. It also stated that the Claimant’s remaining claim or claims were unaffected by the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out after the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity by letter dated 8 May 2024 to make representations or request a hearing because it appeared he had been employed for less than two years. The Claimant made no sufficient representations or request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.