Case 1600690/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Bartlett v Anabatic Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600690/2019
- Decision date
- 30 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Representation
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Bartlett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing on 25 September 2019 at Cardiff was listed to consider the Claimant's complaints about unpaid holiday pay and failure to provide itemised payslips. At the time the hearing was due to begin, the Claimant sent an email confirming that he wished to withdraw his claims. The Tribunal therefore proceeded in the Claimant's absence and issued judgment dismissing the claims on withdrawal.
The Tribunal also amended the Respondent's name to Anabatic Limited after noting that the ET1 and ET3, together with payslips submitted, showed that the employing company rather than Mr Hussain personally was the correct respondent. No merits decision was made on the underlying holiday pay or payslip issues because the claims were withdrawn before the hearing proceeded.
The Respondent's consultant, Mr A Hussain, sought a preparation time order. The Tribunal found that the Claimant had acted unreasonably in the conduct of the proceedings by withdrawing only on the day of the hearing. Applying rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure, the Tribunal considered four hours of preparation time to be reasonable and made an order for £156 at the hourly rate of £39.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The hearing was listed to consider unpaid holiday pay, but the Claimant emailed the Tribunal at the time the hearing was due to start confirming that he wished to withdraw his claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The hearing was also listed to consider failure to provide itemised payslips. The Claimant withdrew the claims by email on the day of hearing, and the Tribunal dismissed them on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £156
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 76 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.