Case 1600693/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stewart Brooker Mr Michael Davies Mr Larry Ford v R & M Williams Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1600693/2018
- Decision date
- 22 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Sutton Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stewart Brooker Mr Michael Davies Mr Larry Ford
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a reserved remedy judgment after the Employment Appeal Tribunal had upheld the earlier TUPE finding. The Respondent accepted that it was the relevant employer for the three unfair dismissal claims and that the effective date of termination for each claimant was 2 January 2018. Liability was therefore no longer in issue, and the tribunal determined compensation only, applying the Employment Rights Act 1996 provisions on basic and compensatory awards and the usual mitigation principles.
For Mr Brooker, the tribunal found 16 years of continuous employment, a gross weekly pay capped at £489, and a notice entitlement agreed at 12 weeks at £417 net. The tribunal accepted that he had made reasonable efforts to find work, but reduced his claimed 10 months of future loss to 5 months as just and equitable, awarding £9,035 for that head. It also awarded £450 for loss of statutory rights. His total award was £25,797.80.
For Mr Davies, the tribunal accepted a start date of 1 January 2010 and 8 years of continuous employment. It preferred his evidence on gross weekly pay, but applied the basic-award cap of £489. The notice period was agreed at 8 weeks at £420 net. His claim for 12 months of future loss was reduced to one month because there was no written verification of his new earnings and his oral evidence was incomplete, producing an award of £1,820 for future loss and £375 for loss of statutory rights. His total award was £11,423.00.
For Mr Ford, the tribunal accepted a start date of 1 January 2002, 16 years of continuous service, and a notice period of 12 weeks at £381.40. It recorded a series of job-search efforts over several months and accepted that he had taken reasonable steps to mitigate his loss, but reduced the claimed 12 months of future loss to 6 months as proportionate. That produced £9,916.40 for future loss and £450 for loss of statutory rights. His total award was £26,109.68. The judgment recorded that no recoupment of benefits was necessary.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Mr Stewart Brooker; compensation for unfair dismissal ordered in the total sum of £25,797.80, comprising basic award £11,736, notice £4,576.80, future loss £9,035 and loss of statutory rights £450. | Upheld | — | £25,798 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mr Michael Davies; compensation for unfair dismissal ordered in the total sum of £11,423.00, comprising basic award £5,868, notice £3,360, future loss £1,820 and loss of statutory rights £375. | Upheld | — | £11,423 |
| Unfair dismissal | Mr Larry Ford; compensation for unfair dismissal ordered in the total sum of £26,109.68, comprising basic award £11,166.48, notice £4,576.80, future loss £9,916.40 and loss of statutory rights £450. | Upheld | — | £26,110 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £63,330
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £28,770
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £34,560
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.118
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.119
- Employment Rights Act 1996 s.123
- duty to mitigate loss
- Countrywide Estate Agents & Ors v Turner UKEAT/0208/13/LA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.