Case 1600693/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Boxagogo Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600693/2024
- Decision date
- 2 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing was listed at Cardiff before Employment Judge C Sharp sitting alone. The respondent was not in attendance and was not excused. The tribunal recorded that the respondent had written to say it would not attend or send a representative, and the hearing was not postponed.
The tribunal dismissed the response under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure because of the respondent's non-attendance. It then found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages to be well-founded. The respondent was directed to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,210, with the claimant responsible for any tax or statutory deductions that may be due.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages well-founded and directed the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,210. | Upheld | — | £1,210 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,210
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.