Case 1600695/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Ellis v Amber Pubs Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1600695/2022
- Decision date
- 8 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Ellis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 16 January 2023 the Tribunal wrote to Amber Pubs Limited and gave it an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why its response should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal’s order dated 27 October 2022. The respondent did not make sufficient written representations and did not request a hearing.
Employment Judge S Moore therefore ordered on 30 January 2023 that the response be struck out. The judgment records only that the respondent remains entitled to notice of any hearings and decisions, and may participate in any hearing only to the extent permitted by the Employment Judge; it does not determine the underlying claims or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not determine a substantive claim; it records that the respondent's response was struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order dated 27 October 2022 after the Tribunal's letter of 16 January 2023 invited representations or a request for a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.