Case 1600697/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D. Williams v DT (Automotive) Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1600697/2019
- Decision date
- 12 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Venue
- Mold
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D. Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Williams brought claims against DT (Automotive) Ltd for breach of contract in relation to notice of termination and for holiday pay accrued on termination of employment. At the hearing at Mold on 10 October 2019 before Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan, the judgment recorded that both claims were withdrawn and dismissed upon settlement.
The tribunal recorded that the respondent paid the claimant £1,269.46 in full and final settlement of those claims. No separate tribunal award was made for either claim, and the record does not split the settlement sum between them.
Reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing. The written record states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim that the respondent breached the contract of employment with regard to notice of termination. The judgment states this claim was withdrawn and dismissed upon settlement, with payment of £1,269.46 in full and final settlement of the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for holiday pay accrued on termination of employment. The judgment states this claim was withdrawn and dismissed upon settlement, with payment of £1,269.46 in full and final settlement of the claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,269
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.