Case 1600700/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C S Davies v Marks and Spencer plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600700/2023
- Decision date
- 10 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge C Sharp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C S Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that, by a letter dated 19 December 2023, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The reasons given were that the claimant had not complied with Tribunal Orders issued at hearings on 26 July 2023 and 31 October 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The hearing listed for 26 January 2024 was therefore cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal Orders and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not separately discuss the unfair dismissal claim in the body of the text; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal Orders and because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not separately discuss the disability discrimination claim in the body of the text; classification follows the supplied listing category. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.