Case 1600700/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Walker v Cross Foxes Dolgellau Ltd. HELD AT: Aberystwyth — 2025
- Case reference
- 1600700/2024
- Decision date
- 19 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
- Panel members
- Ms R Hartwell, Mr P Collier
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal unanimously found that Ms Walker's claim that the Respondent failed to provide an itemised pay statement in respect of the payments made on 1 November and 1 December 2023 was well-founded. The judgment records that no deductions were made from either payment, and therefore no award was made on that claim.
The Claimant's tip-deduction claim was resolved by settlement. The Respondent, without admission of liability, offered £46, the offer was accepted, and the claim was withdrawn on settlement. The judgment then recorded that the Respondent shall pay the Claimant £46 in consequence of the claims disposed of.
The remaining claims were dismissed: age discrimination, failure to pay holiday pay, unauthorised deductions arising from payment at £11.00 per hour instead of £11.50 per hour, breach of contract in relation to notice of termination described as wrongful dismissal, and failure to give a written statement of employment particulars. The written decision does not record any other monetary award beyond the £46 settlement sum.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Failure to provide an itemised pay statement in respect of wages paid on 1 November and 1 December 2023; the Tribunal found the claim well-founded but recorded that no deductions were made from either payment and therefore no award was made. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim concerning deduction from wages in respect of tips; the Respondent offered £46 without admission of liability, the offer was accepted, and the claim was withdrawn on settlement. | Settled | — | £46 |
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | Age | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim that the Respondent paid £11.00 per hour instead of £11.50 per hour. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | Breach of contract in relation to notice of termination. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £46
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.