Case 1600702/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Jones v 236 High Street Limited Date: 7 May 2020 — 2020
- Case reference
- 1600702/2020
- Decision date
- 22 May 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge P Davies Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningIn the absence of an ET3 response form from 236 High Street Limited, Employment Judge P Davies said there was sufficient material before him to make a proper determination and, under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, upheld Miss K Jones’s claims.
The judgment records two successful claims: unpaid holiday pay of £589.07 gross and unpaid notice pay of £246.30 gross. No separate split of the award by compensation head is given beyond those sums, and the judgment states that the claimant is responsible for any income tax or employee national insurance contributions due on the sums awarded in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Award stated as gross unpaid holiday pay under the Rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £589 |
| Breach of contract | Award stated as gross unpaid notice pay under the Rule 21 default judgment. | Upheld | — | £246 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £835
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.