Case 1600703/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Williams v Penn Pharmaceutical Services Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600703/2024
- Decision date
- 1 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Jenkins Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Williams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr S Williams' claim against Penn Pharmaceutical Services Ltd. It recorded that, by a letter dated 16 July 2024, the claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out, including because he had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 25 April 2024 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal found that Mr Williams failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out. The hearing listed for 27-28 August 2024 was vacated and did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 25 April 2024 and had not actively pursued the claim. By letter dated 16 July 2024 the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but no sufficient representations were made and no hearing was requested. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.