Case 1600706/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Evans v HM Commissioners of Revenue and Customs — 2018
- Case reference
- 1600706/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dated
- Venue
- Cardiff
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Evans
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with the claimant's unfair dismissal claim. At the hearing in Cardiff on 19 October 2018, the claimant accepted that she did not have the requisite period of continuous service to pursue an unfair dismissal claim under sections 94 to 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
By consent, the unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed upon withdrawal. The reasons state that the claimant withdrew her claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The judgment records that the claimant continued her claims in relation to her dismissal under the Equality Act 2010, but this document does not determine those claims. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal, after the claimant accepted she lacked the requisite continuous service for an unfair dismissal claim under sections 94 to 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ss.94 to 98 ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.