Case 1600706/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Dickson v Corinthian Access Limited (In Receivership) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600706/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Dickson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 29 February 2024. The respondent, Corinthian Access Limited (In Receivership), failed to present a valid response on time and did not attend the hearing. Employment Judge S Moore determined that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and proceeded to decide the claim on the papers following a video hearing on 13 September 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages (£1,490.38 gross), had dismissed the claimant in breach of contract in respect of notice (damages of £5,961.54, calculated on a gross basis to reflect the likely Post Employment Notice Pay tax treatment), and that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,858.00. The tribunal also found unpaid holiday entitlement of £983.66 gross and a breach of contract relating to unpaid expenses of £30.50.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £12,324.08 in total.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deductions from wages; awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £1,490 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice; damages calculated using gross pay to reflect likely tax treatment as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £5,962 |
| Redundancy | Claimant dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £3,858 |
| Holiday pay | Unpaid holiday entitlement; awarded gross. | Upheld | — | £984 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract for failure to pay expenses. | Upheld | — | £31 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,324
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.