Case 1600708/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J James v Corinthian Access Limited (In Receivership) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1600708/2024
- Decision date
- 16 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore Representation
- Venue
- By video
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J James
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Wales Employment Tribunals on 29 February 2024. The respondent did not attend and failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge S Moore proceeded under rule 21 and determined the claim on the papers. The judgment records that a determination could properly be made in accordance with rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £961.54 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £3,846.16 in damages, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the amount would be taxed as Post Employment Notice Pay. The judgment further states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £3,215.00.
In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £634.62 gross. The total sum awarded was £8,657.32.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £962 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for notice pay; the judgment says the figure was calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood that the claimant would have to pay tax on it as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £3,846 |
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,215 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £635 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,657
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.